Section 7 · 10

Research Library

Every source the research used, graded and annotated — plus the registers that keep it honest: where credible sources disagree, what we investigated and rejected, what we excluded outright, and what we tried to retrieve and could not.

“Check it yourself” only means something if checking is easy. This is where it becomes easy.

The annotated library

Six tiers, from peer-reviewed (T1) to conditional-use (T6). 361 sources do not carry equal authority, and this site never implies they do.

The full archive

The full archive lives in the project repository at /research — around 150,000 words across 29 files, including every claim we investigated and rejected. It is deliberately not summarised away. This page is the window; the archive is the record.

00-methodology.mdResearch process, source hierarchy, evaluation dimensions and weights, evidence-labelling convention
01-iran-current-needs.mdSector-by-sector evidence on Iran's condition
02-reconstruction-needs.mdNeeds across five time horizons
03-domestic-capability.mdWhere Iran already has capability — graduate output, professional registers, research output, brain drain
04-iranian-diaspora.mdDiaspora populations by country, definition-controlled
05-global-skills-and-technology.mdGlobal skills evidence, sector-by-sector AI assessment, and the AI counter-evidence
06-expertise-candidates.mdEvery candidate considered, including rejected ones, with reasons
07-final-expertise-ranking.mdThe 20 categories with all fields per category
08-scoring-and-sensitivity.mdFull score matrix, weighting rationale, sensitivity analysis, the alternative ordering
09-limitations-and-uncertainty.mdWhat this research cannot tell you; weak figures; retrieval failures
10-bibliography.mdAnnotated bibliography — organization, title, date, URL, what it supports, why credible
11-excluded-evidence.mdClaims investigated and rejected, with reasons and source trail
12-website-ready-summary.mdThe curated public version this page is derived from

Research from members

Member research is shown on its own shelf and is never mixed into Iran Builders' own research evidence.

Reviewed for appropriateness — not peer-reviewed. Iran Builders reviews contributions for relevance, sourcing and safety. We do not independently verify every statement, and publication does not constitute endorsement of the author's conclusions. The author is responsible for the accuracy of their work. Sources are listed so you can check it yourself.

No member research has been published yet.